The athletic development
curriculum at these school was schools was based on the research of A. Novikov and N.G. Ozolin on the concurrent
system of long-term training. During the first few years, all children
performed a variety of sports such as soccer, running, skating, gymnastics,
rowing, track and field, and team sports.
This period of multilateral development was known as general physical
preparation (GPP). The main goal of GPP
was to order develop functional work capacities and a wide variety of motor
skills that would serve as a base for increased athletic development and performance
at the higher levels. During this time, sport-specific training was limited,
and constituted only 5-10% of the training load. There was also a considerable amount of the
time during the training directed to educating the athlete on sport-specific
basics and fundamental techniques.
Specialized physical
preparation (SPP) programs began between 15 –17 years, once children were
selected for a particular sport. SPP
included training that was aimed at developing physical, technical, tactical
and psychological adaptations that would be necessary to succeed in the given
sport. During this period, the training
was more structured and exercises were chosen were specifically prepare the
athlete to succeed in the sport of choice.
As the athlete progressed in training age, GPP was not totally omitted
from the training program. GPP was kept
in the program to some degree to help build and maintain strength and physical
work capacity, as well as providing a break from the specific training of the
particular sport. However, as the training of the athlete advanced, the ratio
between GPP (multilateral development) and SPP (specialized training)
decreased. When the athlete first began
the athletic development process, GPP constituted roughly 60% of the total
training activities, while 40% was dedicated to sport-specific education and
activities. As the athlete’s work
capacity grew and the training process progressed, the proportion of SPP in the
program increased, while the proportion of GPP included decreased. This trend
gradually increased as the athlete progressed towards high performance level –
sports mastery. GPP was never totally
eliminated, and even at the highest levels GPP constitutes approximately 20% of
the total training volume, while SPP comprised the main body (80%).